《釣魚(yú)島是中國(guó)的固有領(lǐng)土》白皮書(shū)（全文）
White Paper: Diaoyu Dao, an Inherent Territory of China
0 
調(diào)整字號(hào)大小: 
| 結(jié)束語(yǔ) | Conclusion |
| 釣魚(yú)島自古以來(lái)就是中國(guó)的固有領(lǐng)土，中國(guó)對(duì)其擁有無(wú)可爭(zhēng)辯的主權(quán)。20世紀(jì)70年代，中日在實(shí)現(xiàn)邦交正?；途喗Y(jié)《中日和平友好條約》時(shí)，兩國(guó)老一輩領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人著眼兩國(guó)關(guān)系大局，就將“釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題放一放，留待以后解決”達(dá)成諒解和共識(shí)。但近年來(lái)，日本不斷對(duì)釣魚(yú)島采取單方面舉措，特別是對(duì)釣魚(yú)島實(shí)施所謂“國(guó)有化”，嚴(yán)重侵犯中國(guó)主權(quán)，背離中日兩國(guó)老一輩領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人達(dá)成的諒解和共識(shí)。這不但嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了中日關(guān)系，也是對(duì)世界反法西斯戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)勝利成果的否定和挑戰(zhàn)。 | Diaoyu Dao has been an inherent territory of China since ancient times, and China has indisputable sovereignty over Diaoyu Dao. As China and Japan were normalizing relations and concluding the Sino-Japanese Treaty of Peace and Friendship in the 1970s, the then leaders of the two countries, acting in the larger interest of China-Japan relations, reached important understanding and consensus on "leaving the issue of Diaoyu Dao to be resolved later." But in recent years, Japan has repeatedly taken unilateral measures concerning Diaoyu Dao and conducted in particular the so-called "nationalization" of Diaoyu Dao. This severely infringed upon China's sovereignty and ran counter to the understanding and consensus reached between the older generation of leaders of the two countries. It has not only seriously damaged China-Japan relations, but also rejected and challenged the outcomes of the victory of the World Anti-Fascist War. |
| 中國(guó)強(qiáng)烈敦促日本尊重歷史和國(guó)際法，立即停止一切損害中國(guó)領(lǐng)土主權(quán)的行為。中國(guó)政府捍衛(wèi)國(guó)家領(lǐng)土主權(quán)的決心和意志是堅(jiān)定不移的，有信心、有能力捍衛(wèi)國(guó)家主權(quán)，維護(hù)領(lǐng)土完整。 | China strongly urges Japan to respect history and international law and immediately stop all actions that undermine China's territorial sovereignty. The Chinese government has the unshakable resolve and will to uphold the nation's territorial sovereignty. It has the confidence and ability to safeguard China's state sovereignty and territorial integrity. |
Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)
No comments.
